One of many factors differing between management and leadership is that the ability or even the responsibility to inspire and to get inspired. A leader, someone who could apply and instill spirit and courage onto his people or group, will surely uses psychological approach to affect either consciously or unconsciously to his followers.
They who are apparently called as “natural leaders” and could effectively inspire his people and groups without really realizing the tactics or strategies he uses are considerably charismatic leaders. On the other hand, the conscious leader applies various psychological strategies that influence “reactions” of the group to the environment where they exist.
In several ‘directive’ (this direct means as opposed to unconsciously do) organizational psychology disciplines like “directive communication” and theories such as “The ripple effect”, it is understood that leadership is a product of command and awareness of the influences and reactions of a group on the individual as well as an individual on the group.
A successful application of a leader in directive organizational psychology by giving more modification on specific leadership behaviors towards his group will yield an organizational culture that is in essence of “inspired”. And the ”inspired” will bring about the success to the leader alone.
In several ‘directive’ (this direct means as opposed to unconsciously do) organizational psychology disciplines like “directive communication” and theories such as “The ripple effect”, it is understood that leadership is a product of command and awareness of the influences and reactions of a group on the individual as well as an individual on the group.
A successful application of a leader in directive organizational psychology by giving more modification on specific leadership behaviors towards his group will yield an organizational culture that is in essence of “inspired”. And the ”inspired” will bring about the success to the leader alone.